“Me-time is…”: Exploring me-time of long-distance relationship working couples
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu1278Keywords:
autonomy, long-distance relationships, me-time, ownership, working coupleAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the concept of ‘me-time’ among dual-income couples experiencing long-distance relationships. Me-time can help prevent and cope with the potential negative impacts of such conditions, while also contributing to personal well-being. However, exploration of this phenomenon remains limited, particularly in Indonesia. This study employed a phenomenological method with descriptive analysis. Data were collected from three working couples from Indonesia through elicited synchronous audio calls and self-reports regarding their me-time activities over a specific period. The study identified five qualitative characteristics of the meaning of me-time: basic needs and self-reward, replenishing resources, personal fulfillment, shared satisfaction with children, and temporary detachment from role demands. The findings also indicate a shift in the meaning of me-time during long-distance relationships, from shared relational experiences toward more individual and personally meaningful activities. The consistency of engaging in me-time is supported by autonomy and a sense of ownership over personal time, which serve as important means of maintaining psychological and relational well-being within a collectivistic cultural context.
Keywords: long-distance relationships, ‘me-time’, working couple
Downloads
References
Alverina, Y., Hanami, Y., & Abidin, F. (2024). “Working is my me-time”: Exploring the perception of me-time among working mothers. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 11(2), 264–283. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu910.
Anand, L., Du Bois, S. N., Sher, T. G., & Grotkowski, K. (2017). Defying tradition: gender roles in long-distance relationships. The Family Journal, 26(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717731342.
Bintoro, D. W. (2022). Implikasi undang-undang cipta kerja tentang ketenagakerjaan. Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum sumpah Pemuda, 28(1), 1–8. https://zenodo.org/records/6579095.
Cheng, A. W., Rizkallah, S., & Narizhnaya, M. (2020). Individualism vs. collectivism. Dalam B. J. Carducci, C. S. Nave, J. S. Mio, R. E. Riggio (Ed.), The wiley encyclopedia of personality and individual differences: Clinical, applied, and cross-cultural research (hlm. 287–297). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119547181.ch313
Chua, S. N., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on the role of autonomy in solitary behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(5), 645–648. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.5.645-648
Delgado, J. (2019). Re-thinking relational autonomy: Challenging the triumph of autonomy through vulnerability. Bioethics Update, 5(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioet.2018.12.001
Du Bois, S. N., Sher, T. G., Grotkowski, K., Aizenman, T., Slesinger, N., & Cohen, M. (2015). Going the distance: Health in long-distance versus proximal relationships. The Family Journal, 24(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480715616580
Epley, N., & Schroeder, J. (2014). Mistakenly seeking solitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 1980–1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037323
Forward, C., Khan, H. T. A., & Fox, P. (2023). The experience of living alone as an older woman in the UK during the covid pandemic: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMC Public Health, 23, Artikel 244. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-14988-2
Heu, L. C., & Brennecke, T. (2023). By yourself, yet not alone: Making space for loneliness. Urban Studies, 60(16), 3187–3197. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231169669
Heu, L. C., Hansen, N., van Zomeren, M., Levy, A., Ivanova, T. T., Gangadhar, A., & Radwan, M. (2021). Loneliness across cultures with different levels of social embeddedness: A qualitative study. Personal Relationships, 28(2), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12367
Jiang, L. C., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12029
Jurkane-Hobein, I. (2015). Do i qualify for a love relationship? Social norms and long-distance relationships in post-soviet latvia. Sexuality & Culture, 19(2), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-014-9263-0
Kelmer, G., Rhoades, G., Stanley, S., & Markman, H. (2013). Relationship quality, commitment, and stability in long-distance relationships. Family Process, 52(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01418.x
Kumaria, S., Fivecoat, H., Li, J., Scott, B., & Sher, T. G. (2024). Pressurizing or encouraging: Health behaviors among long‐distance couples. Family Process, 63(4), 1721–1738. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12975
Lewis, S. C. (2022). What is ‘me-time’? An exploratory investigation into the qualitative characteristics of me-time for parents of preschoolers [Master’s thesis, University of Canterbury]. https://hdl.handle.net/10092/103770
Long, C. R., & Averill, J. R. (2003). Solitude: An exploration of benefits of being alone. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00204
Madden, M., & Rainie, L. (2015, 20 Mei). Americans’ Attitudes About Privacy, Security and Surveillance. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/05/20/americans-attitudes-about-privacy-security-and-surveillance/
Masterson, C. R., & Hoobler, J. M. (2015). Care and career: A family identity‐based typology of dual‐earner couples. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1945
McDaniel, B. T., Galovan, A. M., & Drouin, M. (2021). Daily technoference, technology use during couple leisure time, and relationship quality. Media Psychology, 24(5), 637–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1783561
Neilson, J., & Stanfors, M. (2018). Time alone or together? Trends and trade-offs among dual-earner couples, Sweden 1990–2010. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12414
Pistole, M. C., & Roberts, A. (2011). Measuring long-distance romantic relationships: A validity study. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 44(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175611400288
Purba, R., & Khoman, M. (2012). When distance apart: The roles of emotional-social intelligence on trust among individuals engaging in long distance relationships. Psikologia: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi, 7, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.32734/psikologia.v7i1.2531
Rodriguez, M., Bellet, B. W., & McNally, R. J. (2020). Reframing time spent alone: Reappraisal buffers the emotional effects of isolation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 44(6), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10128-x
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., & Dodd, H. (2025). Dual-earner couples. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 369–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110622-053405
Stafford, L. (2015). Long-distance relationships. Dalam C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, S. R. Wilson, J. P. Dillard, J. Caughlin, & D. Solomon (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic075
Stafford, L., Merolla, A. J., & Castle, J. D. (2006). When long-distance dating partners become geographically close. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(6), 901–919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506070472
Stussman, B., Calco, B., Norato, G., Gavin, A., Chigurupati, S., Nath, A., & Walitt, B. (2023). A mixed methods system for the assessment of post exertional malaise in encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.24.23288821
Tseng, C. F. (2016). My love, how i wish you were by my side: Maintaining intercontinental long-distance relationships in Taiwan. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38(3), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9384-8
Wanninayake, S. D. K., Thennakoon, D., & Kailasapathy, P. (2025). Honey, are you ok? Gender, coping, and well-being among dual-earner couples in Sri Lanka during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dalam T. S. Ravindran, M. Sivakami, A. Bhushan, S. F. Rashid, K. S. Khan (Ed.), Handbook on sex, gender and health: Perspectives from South Asia (hlm. 465–493). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2098-9_17
Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Luh Putu Chandra Dewi, Suryanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) for the exposure of their work with an acknowledgement of Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology (JPU) as an outlet of their published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
