Eksplorasi perilaku belajar akademik: Studi pada mahasiswa di Yogyakarta

Penulis

  • Titik Kristiyani Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia
  • Faturochman Faturochman Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu426

Kata Kunci:

aktivitas selingan, belajar akademik, persiapan belajar, strategi belajar, unsur sosial dalam belajar

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi perilaku belajar akademik mahasiswa di Yogyakarta. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 509 mahasiswa di Yogyakarta yang dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Desain penelitian ini adalah analisis isi kualitatif dengan menggunakan kuesioner terbuka dan wawancara. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa terdapat lima elemen utama dalam perilaku belajar mahasiswa, yaitu strategi belajar, aktivitas selingan, isi kegiatan belajar, persiapan belajar, dan unsur sosial dalam belajar. Di antara unsur-unsur perilaku belajar dalam temuan tersebut, aktivitas selingan menjadi temuan khas yang menarik dalam konteks penelitian ini karena memiliki perbedaan orientasi dengan unsur-unsur lainnya. Temuan khas tersebut dapat dijadikan acuan untuk mengubah konsep belajar yang memasukkan teknologi informasi agar tidak menjadi selingan yang mengganggu, tetapi justru menjadi bagian dari proses belajar.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Afif, A., & Kaharuddin, F. (2015). Perilaku belajar peserta didik ditinjau dari pola asuh otoriter orang tua. Auladuna, 2(2), 287–300. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/auladuna/article/view/883

Awla, H. K. (2014). Learning styles and their relation to teaching styles. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.23

Aunurrahman, A., Kurniawati, T., & Ramadhiyanti, Y. (2013). Exploring Indonesian college students strategies in learning english language. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 4(2), 4–13. https://www.awej.org/images/AllIssues/Volume4/Volume4Number3Sept2013/27.pdf

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001029

Bhatti, R., & Bart, W. M. (2013). On the effect of learning style on scholastic achievement. Current Issues in Education, 16(2), 1–5. http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1121

Biggs, J. B. (1987). Study process questionnaire manual: Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED308199

Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The Revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433

Byrnes, J. P. (2008). Cognitive development during adolescence. Dalam G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (hlm. 227–246). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756607.ch11

Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I., & Gimranova, D. (2021). Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: New empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8

Chiesi, F., Primi, C., Bilgin, A. A., Lopez, M. V., del Carmen Fabrizio, M., Gozlu, S., & Tuan, N. M. (2016). Measuring university students’ approaches to learning statistics: An invariance study. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915596125

Chiţiba, C. A. (2012). Lifelong learning challenges and opportunities for traditional universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1943–1947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.408

Chua, B. L., Tan, O.-S., & Liu, W. C. (2016). Development and validation of the Problem-Based Learning Process Inventory (PBLPI). New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal, 19(1), 20–40. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1211395.pdf

Dattalo, P. (2008). Determining sample size: Balancing power, precision, and practicality. Oxford University Press.

Duff, A. (2004). The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (RASI) and its use in management education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404040461

Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.2308/iace.2007.22.2.183

Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 10(4), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273

Firmansyah, M. A. (2017). Analisis hambatan belajar mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2036

Gibbs, G. (2005). Improving the Quality of Student Learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Griesemer, J. A. (2014). Using social media to enhance students’ learning experiences. Quality Approaches in Higher Education, 3(1), 8–11.

Gündüz, N., & Özcan, D. (2010). Learning styles of students from different cultures and studying in Near East University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.107

Hardianto. (2014). Identifikasi permasalahan belajar mahasiswa program studi pendidikan biologi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pasir Pengaraian. Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research, 3(2), 81–88. https://www.neliti.com/publications/59133/identifikasi-permasalahan-belajar-mahasiswa-program-studi-pendidikan-biologi-fak

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. Sage.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x

Irvine, J. (2017). A comparison of revised Bloom and Marzano’s new taxonomy of learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 33, 1–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1161486.pdf

Kaya, T., & Bicen, H. (2016). The effects of social media on students’ behaviors: Facebook as a case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.036

Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self‐regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. Tesol Quarterly, 48(2), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.129

Kristiyani, T. (2016). Self-regulated learning: Konsep, implikasi dan tantangannya bagi siswa di Indonesia. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Kristiyani, T., & Faturochman, F. (2018). Students’ perspectives on concepts, factors, and models related to the attainment of achievement. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 34(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v34i1.2022

Laal, M. (2011). Lifelong learning: What does it mean? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28(May), 470–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.090

Ma, X., & Wang, J. (2001). A confirmatory examination of walberg’s model of educational productivity in student career aspiration. Educational Psychology, 21(4), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120090821

Marambe, K. N., Vermunt, J. D., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2012). A cross-cultural comparison of student learning patterns in higher education. Higher Education, 64(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10734-011 -9494-z

Markovi´, S., & Jovanovi´, N. (2012). Learning style as a factor which affects the quality of e-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 38(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9253-7

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives: Applying the new taxonomy. Corwin Press.

McCombs, B. L. (2017). Historical review of learning strategies research: Strategies for the whole learner—A tribute to Claire Ellen Weinstein and early researchers of this topic. Frontiers in Education, 2, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00006.

Murti, W. (2019). Pengaruh perilaku belajar siswa terhadap prestasi belajar IPA Biologi siswa kelas VIII SMPN 4 Bantimurung. Jurnal Binomial, 2(1), 54–63. https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/binomial/article/view/185

Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/328888

Pai, H.-H., Sears, D. A., & Maeda, Y. (2015). Effects of small-group learning on transfer: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10648-0 14-9260-8

Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 30(2), 450–462. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221

Pelton, J. A. (2014). How our majors believe they learn: Student learning strategies in an undergraduate theory course. Teaching Sociology, 42(4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X14542351

Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: A comprehensive guide (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Sears, D. A., & Pai, H. H. (2012). Effects of cooperative versus individual study on learning and motivation after reward-removal. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(3), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2011.602372

Sears, D. A., & Reagin, J. M. (2013). Individual versus collaborative problem solving: Divergent outcomes depending on task complexity. Instructional Science, 41(6), 1153–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9271-8

Short, E. J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. Dalam C. B. McCormick, G. E. Miller, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research (hlm. 33–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8838-8_2

Susetyo, Y. F., & Kumara, A. (2012). Orientasi tujuan, atribusi penyebab, dan belajar berdasar regulasi diri. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(1), 95–111. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/10.22146/jpsi.6969

Tait, H., & Entwistle, N. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Education, 31(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129109

Tokan, M. K., & Imakulata, M. M. (2019). The effect of motivation and learning behaviour on student achievement. South African Journal of Education, 39(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n1a1510

Tongco, M. D. C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158

Tsai, M.-J. (2009). The model of strategic e-learning: Understanding and evaluating student e-learning from metacognitive perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 34–48. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220374300_The_Model_of_Strategic_e-Learning_Understanding_and_Evaluating_Student_e-Learning_from_Metacognitive_Perspectives

Turingan, J. P., & Yang, Y.-C. (2009). A cross-cultural comparison of self-regulated learning skills between Korean and Filipino college students. Asian Social Science, 5(12), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n12p3

Tus, J. (2020). The influence of study attitudes and study habits on the academic performance of the students. IJARW1382 International Journal of All Research Writings, 2(4), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13093391.v1

Vermunt, J. D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172925

Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2016). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 359–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0005-y

Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(3), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2022-11-30

Cara Mengutip

Kristiyani, T., & Faturochman, F. (2022). Eksplorasi perilaku belajar akademik: Studi pada mahasiswa di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat, 9(2), 254–280. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu426

Terbitan

Vol 9 No 2 (2022)

Bagian

Original Research

Citation Check

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Titik Kristiyani, Faturochman Faturochman

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Penulis sepakat dengan ketentuan berikut: 

  1. Penulis memiliki hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak untuk publikasi pertama dengan karya yang secara simultan dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya dengan pengakuan kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini.
  2. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk mem-posting tulisan mereka secara daring (misalnya, dalam repositori institusional atau di situs web mereka) untuk pemaparan karya mereka dengan pengakuan Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Jurnal Indonesia Psikologi Adat (JPU) sebagai outlet dari karya mereka yang diterbitkan .

 


Tulisan ini dilisensi menurut Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.